tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12602489.post3185669548813769126..comments2024-03-24T15:07:18.773+01:00Comments on The Stuttering Brain: Thinking in terms of circuitTom Weidighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02084153394215001999noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12602489.post-62082273295079644702006-09-25T20:41:00.000+02:002006-09-25T20:41:00.000+02:00And we now have theories that can be falsified.And we now have theories that can be falsified.Tom Weidighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02084153394215001999noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12602489.post-22900335636498010732006-09-22T21:32:00.000+02:002006-09-22T21:32:00.000+02:00In other words, finally we can apply the scientifi...In other words, finally we can apply the scientific principle called Ockham's razor to the hypotheses that intend to explain the stutter, that is: "A plurality (of reasons) should not be posited without necessity" [William de Ockham (1285-1349)]. Now, there is a filter.<br /><br />Em outras palavras, finalmente podemos agora aplicar o princípio científico da navalha de Ockham às hipóteses que pretendem explicar a gagueira, ou seja: <br />"Uma pluralidade (de razões) não deve ser invocada sem que haja necessidade" [William de Ockham (1285-1349)]. Agora, há um filtro.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com